Do you wonder why ac is used at all? Isn’t it a lot more complicated than dc? Well, ac may be more complicated in theory, but in practice it is a lot simpler to use when it is necessary to provide electricity to a large number of people.
Alternating current lends itself well to being transformed to lower or higher voltages, according to the needs of electrical apparatus. It is not so easy to change dc voltages. Electrochemical cells produce dc directly, but they are impractical for the needs of large populations. Serving millions of consumers requires the immense power of falling or flowing water, the ocean tides, wind, fossil fuels, controlled nuclear reactions, or geothermal heat. All of these energy sources can be used to drive turbines that turn ac generators.
Technology is advancing in the realm of solar-electric energy; someday a significant part of our electricity might come from photovoltaic power plants. These would generate dc. High voltages could be attained by connecting giant arrays of solar panels in series. But there would be a problem transforming this voltage down to manageable levels for consumer use.
Thomas Edison is said to have favored dc over ac for electrical power transmission in the early days, as the electric utilities were first being devised and constructed. His colleagues argued that ac would work better. But perhaps Edison knew something that his contemporaries did not. There is one advantage to dc in utility applications, and it involves the transmission of energy over great distances using wires. Direct currents, at extremely high voltages, are transported more efficiently than alternating currents.
The wire has less effective resistance with dc than with ac, and there is less energy lost in the magnetic fields around the wires. Direct-current high-tension transmission lines are being considered for future use. Right now, the main problem is expense. Sophisticated power-conversion equipment is needed. If the cost can be brought within reason, Edison will be